nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2003, 04, 100-107
吉登斯的权力观
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
发布时间: 2003-08-30
出版时间: 2003-08-30
移动端阅读
摘要:

权力是吉登斯思想体系中一个极其重要的范畴。权力概念不仅是吉登斯借以沟通主体与客体关系的基本纽带 ,同时还是他研究社会历史的基本视角。在批判地分析主体主义与客体主义对立权力观的基础上 ,吉登斯以一种二重性的方式阐述了他关于权力的观点。一方面 ,他将权力视为行动者个人所具有的“转换能力” ,认为它是行动者自主性的表现 ,是人类行动的普遍特征和人之为人的基础。另一方面 ,他又将权力视为行动者行为互动过程中存在的支配能力 ,认为它是行动者依赖性表现 ,是资源不对称分配带来的结果。资源是沟通权力两个方面的媒介。“控制辩证法”是权力两个方面的有机统一 ,是社会关系的本质特征。吉登斯将社会历史形态划分为部落社会、阶级分化社会和阶级社会三种类型 ,每种类型都反映了权力两个方面之间的辩证统一

Abstract:

Power is a very important category in Giddens' theory. It not only serves to bridge the opposite conceptions of “subject” and “object”, but also contributes to the analysis of social history. On the basis of his critical analysis of the opposite power views of subjectivism and objectivism, Giddens elucidates his power thesis from a dual perspective. On the one hand, he regards power as the agent's “transformative capability”, and deems it as the exhibition of the agent's autonomy, the general characteristics of man's act and the basis for human beings. On the other hand, he regards power as “domination” that originates from the agent's interaction, and deems it as the exhibition of the agent's interdependence and the result of the asymmetry, distribution of resources, connecting the two aspects. The “dialectics of control”, which reflects the nature of the development of social history, is the organic combination of the two aspects of power. Giddens divides human society in history into three types: tribal society, class dividing society and class society, each reflecting the dialectic unification of transformative capacity and domination.

参考文献

[1][英]吉登斯民族-国家与暴力[M]北京:三联书店,1998.

[2][英]AnthonyGiddens,AcontemporaryCritiqueofHistoricalMaterialism[M],London:theMacmillanPressLtd,1981.

[3]吉登斯把马克思、韦伯和涂尔干等三位社会学家所代表的学术倾向及其所造成的影响看作是社会学的三大传统。可参见[英]吉登斯资本主义与现代社会理论[M]台北:远流出版事业股份有限公司,1989.

[4][英]AnthonyGiddens,NewRulesofSociologicalMethod[M],NewYork:BasicBooks,1993.

[5][英]AnthonyGiddens,CapitalismandModernSocialTheory———AnanalysisofthewritingsofMarx,DurkheimandMaxWeber[M],London:CambridgeUniversityPress,1971.

[6][英]AnthonyGiddens,CentralProblemsinSocialTheory[M],London:theMacmillanPressLtd,1979.

[7]转引自[英]AnthonyGiddens,CentralProblemsinSocialTheory[M],London:theMacmillanPressLtd,1979.

[8][英]吉登斯资本主义与现代社会理论[M]台北:远流出版事业股份有限公司,1989.

[9][英]安东尼·吉登斯杜尔凯姆[M]北京:昆仑出版社,1999.

[10][英]AnthonyGiddens,DurkheimonPoliticsandtheState[M],London:PolityPress,1986.

[11]转引自[英]AnthonyGiddens,StudiesinSocialandPoliticalTheory[M],London:Hutchinson&Co.(publishers)Ltd,1977.

[12][英]AnthonyGiddens,Introductiontosociology[M].London&NewYork:W .W .Norton&Company,Inc.1996.

[13][英]吉登斯社会的构成[M]北京:三联书店,1998.

[14][英]AnthonyGiddens,ProfilesandCritiquesinSocialTheory[M],London:theMacmillanPressLtd,1982.

[15][英]AnthonyGiddens,ClassesandtheDivisionofLabor[C],London:CambridgeUniversityPress,1982.

[16]吉登斯提出了分析社会变迁的五个角度:结构性原则、片断化特征、跨社会系统、时空边缘和世界时间,相关内容可参阅[英]吉登斯社会的构成[M]北京:三联书店,1998.

[17]有关“双重断裂”的详细内容可参阅:[英]吉登斯批判的社会学导论[M]台北:唐山出版社,1995.

[18][英]吉登斯现代性的后果[M]南京:译林出版社,2000.

[19][英]吉登斯现代性与自我认同[M]北京:三联书店,1998.

基本信息:

中图分类号:D095.61

引用信息:

[1]郭忠华.吉登斯的权力观[J].东方论坛(青岛大学学报),2003(04):100-107.

发布时间:

2003-08-30

出版时间:

2003-08-30

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索