nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, No.198 141-156
问题金融机构二级资本市场化处置的功能异化与制度矫正
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI:
投稿时间: 2025-04-08
投稿日期(年): 2025
修回时间: 2025-12-02
终审时间: 2026-01-19
终审日期(年): 2026
审稿周期(年): 1
发布时间: 2026-03-15
出版时间: 2026-03-15
移动端阅读
摘要:

问题金融机构处置的二级资本市场化改革,是将金融体系表外风险转化为具备流动性溢价的可交易资本品,实现风险单元的智能切割与市场重组。然而现行处置机制陷于行政兜底惯性、市场约束软化,房地产周期下行,地方债务风险显现,致使风险分散、资本补充、市场出清三大市场化处置的应然功能发生异化,主要体现为风险社会化蔓延、监管套利空间滋生、市场约束失灵。这需以构建“市场化自救体系”为功能复归的突破口,通过框定风险流转的合法边界,依托精准投资者分层激活市场风险识别、定价与消化的功能,推动功能监管转型、压实主体责任、补位自律规则,有效阻隔风险向零售市场和社会公众被动转嫁,为防范系统性风险提供市场化处置的新范式。

Abstract:

The secondary capital market-oriented innovation in the disposal of troubled financial institutions involves transforming off-balance-sheet risks in the financial system into tradable capital products with liquidity premiums,thereby enabling intelligent segmentation of risk units and market-based restructuring.However,the current disposal mechanisms are deeply entrenched in the inertia of administrative bailouts,resulting in softened market discipline.Amid the downward phase of the real estate cycle and the emergence of local government debt risks,the three core expected functions of market-oriented disposal-risk diversification,capital replenishment,and market clearing-have undergone functional alienation.This is primarily manifested in widespread socialization of risks,the breeding of regulatory arbitrage opportunities,and the failure of market discipline.To achieve functional restoration,the breakthrough lies in constructing a governance closed loop that “market-oriented self-rescue system”.This can be accomplished by delineating the legitimate boundaries for risk circulation,activating the market’s functions of risk identification,pricing,and absorption through precise investor stratification;promoting the transition to functional regulation,enforcing the principal responsibilities of entities,and supplementing self-regulatory rules.These measures can effectively prevent the passive transfer of risks to the retail market and the general public,thereby providing a new market-oriented paradigm for preventing systemic financial risks.

参考文献

(1)Arner D., Financial Stability, Economic Growth, and the Role of Law, Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 143.

(2)黄紫豪:《包商银行65亿元二级资本债本金全额减记》,2026年2月28日,https: //news.cnstock.com/news, jg-202011-4618059.htm.

(3)邢会强:《金融法的未来:金融法内部结构之变动趋势展望》,《法学评论》2022年第5期。

(4)Stiglitz E. J., Weiss A., Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information, The American Economic Review, vol. 71, no. 3, 1981, pp. 393-410.

(5)李丹丹:《锦州银行,于一场股东大会后重生》,2020年7月13日,https: //www.cnstock.com/commonDetail/67038.

(6)《关于拍卖中国华阳投资控股有限公司持有的鞍山银行五亿股权的通知》,2023年6月9日,https: //www.nafmii.org.cn/xxpl/zwrzgjxxpl/fxwj/202202/t20220218_199440.html?FILE_MD5=d3b0c9fd6a8a4db986f3f14dd52145e9&PUBLISH_ID=d3b0c9fd6a8a4db986f3f14dd52145e9.

(7)Pistor K., The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality, Princeton University Press, 2019, p. 207.

(8)Freixas X., Laeven L., Peydró J., et al., Systemic Risk, Crises, and Macroprudential Regulation, MIT Press, 2015, p.177.

(9)Schwarcz S. L., Structured Finance: A Guide to the Principles of Asset Securitization(4th ed.), Wolters Kluwer, 2004, pp. 212-215.

(10)Crane D. B., Froot K. A., Mason P. S., et al., The Global Financial System: A Functional Perspective, Harvard Business School Press, 1995, p. 134.

(11)Maynard J. K., The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Palgrave Macmillan, 1936, p. 155-158.

(12)Markowitz M. H., Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance, vol. 7, no. 1, 1952, pp. 77-91.

(13)Sharpe F. W., Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk, Journal of Finance, vol. 19, no. 3, 1964, pp. 425-442.

(14)Minsky P. H., The Financial Instability Hypothesis: An Interpretation of Keynes and an Alternative to “Standard” Theory, Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, no. 74, 1992, pp. 6-15.

(15)燕红忠、蒋震:《中国金融监管模式的演进与构建——金融史视野下的“无危机增长”之谜》,《探索与争鸣》2024年第6期。

(16)张晓燕、李佳玉、李武:《央地双层金融监管协同治理研究——党的二十届三中全会关于国家治理能力提升背景下的金融监管协同水平评价》,《金融经济学研究》2025年第4期。

(17)《国务院关于积极稳妥降低企业杠杆率的意见》,2016年10月10日,https: //www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2016-10/10/content_5116835.htm.

(18)《海航集团被申请破产重整》,2021年10月30日,https: //www.ccdi.gov.cn/yaowen/202101/t20210130_235060.html.

(19)Baldauf M., Mollner J., High-Frequency Trading and Market Performance, Journal of Finance, vol. 75, no. 3, 2020, pp. 1495-1540.

(20)Menkveld J. A., High Frequency Trading and the New Market Makers, Journal of Financial Markets, vol. 16, no. 4, 2013, pp. 712-740.

(21)Acemoglu D., Ozdaglar A., Tahbaz-Salehi A., Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks, American Economic Review, vol. 105, no. 2, 2015, pp. 564-608.

(22)贺丹:《金融稳定监管权力的法律配置——兼论金融稳定法的立法逻辑》,《法律适用》2024年第12期。

(23)Merton C. R., A Functional Perspective of Financial Intermediation, Financial Management, vol. 24, no. 2, 1995, pp. 23-41.

(24)李曙光:《论金融风险处置的司法机制》,《法律适用》2024年第12期。

(25)Pistor K., The Governance of Global Finance: A Legal Perspective, Columbia Law Review, vol. 119, no. 7, 2019, pp. 1985-2012.

(26)Arner W. D., Buckley P. R., Redesigning the Architecture of the Global Financial System, Minnesota Journal of International Law, vol. 11, 2010, p. 15.

(27)《2024年四季度银行业保险业主要监管指标数据情况》,2025年2月21日,https: //www.nfra.gov.cn/cn/view/pages/ItemDetail.html?docId=1199327&itemId=915&generaltype=0.

(28)Kenneth R., Yang Y. C., China’s Real Estate Conundrum: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Recent Market Downturn, NBER Working Paper, no. 31489, 2023, p. 9.

(29)International Monetary Fund, 2023 Artice IV Consultation—Press Release; Staff Report and Statement by the Executive Director the PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, 2024-02,https: //www.imf.org/-/media/files/publications/cr/2024/english/1chnea2024001.pdf.

(30)刘志伟:《地方金融监管权力法治化的反思与重塑》,《政法论丛》2024年第5期。

(31)Grauwe D. P., The Governance of a Fragile Eurozone, Australian Economic Review, vol. 15, no. 6, 2012, pp. 10-13.

(32)Reinhart C., Rogoff K., This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly, Princeton University Press, 2009, pp. 8-14.

(33)Mario B., The Sovereign-Bank Nexus in the Euro Area: Financial & Real Channels, Journal of Financial Stability, vol. 12, 2019, pp. 8-9.

(34)Posner A. R., Divergent Paths: The Academy and the Judiciary, Harvard University Press, 2016, p. 89.

(35)中国人民银行金融稳定分析小组:《中国金融稳定报告(2023)》, 北京:中国金融出版社,2023年,第67页。

(36)Coase H. R., The Problem of Social Cost, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 3, 1960, pp. 18-19.

(37)张倩:《不良资产证券化试点扩至城商行 个人贷款类产品有望持续扩容》,2017年2月15日,https: //www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-02/15/c_1120467305.htm.

(38)Pistor K., The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality, Princeton University Press, 2019, p. 132.

(39)中国人民银行金融稳定分析小组:《中国金融稳定报告(2023)》,第46页。

(40)李蕊:《“化债”的关键抓手——地方政府融资平台公司转型的法治逻辑》,《探索与争鸣》2025年第4期。

(41)Shiller J. R., Finance and the Good Society, Princeton University Press, 2012, pp. 178-179.

(42)包康赟:《商业银行风险处置措施的优化进路:以法经济学为视角》,《法学家》2024年第4期。

(43)Andrade C. S., Chhaochharia V., The Cost of Sovereign Default: Evidence from the Stock Market, The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 31, no. 5, 2018, p. 1707.

(44)Stiglitz J. E., Markets, Market Failures, and Development, The American Economic Review, vol. 79, no. 2, 1989, pp. 197-203.

(45)Coffee C. J., The Political Economy of Dodd-Frank: Why Financial Reform Tends to be Frustrated, Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper, no. 414, 2012, pp. 22-25.

(46)张钦昱:《数据立法范式的转型:从确权赋权到社会本位》,《经贸法律评论》2023年第1期。

(47)熊伟:《地方专项债券的“项目制”隐忧及其治理方略》,《探索与争鸣》2025年第 4期。

(48)郭富青:《论弘扬企业家精神的私法保障》,《学术论坛》2025年第1期。

(49)冯辉:《私募投资基金适当性义务的履行标准与赔偿责任》,《法学》2025年第4期。

(50)周陈:《论企业破产中政府债权保护法律制度的构建》,《法商研究》2025年第3期。

(51)刘冰:《论公司清算义务法律制度的缺陷及完善》,《法商研究》2025年第3期。

(52)Allen F., Gale D., Comparing Finan cial Systems, MIT Press, 2000, p. 47.

(53)Bank for International Settlements, Annual Economic Report 2023,2023-05,https: //www.bis.org/publ/arpdf/ar2023e.pdf.

(54)FDIC, FDIC Acts to Protect All Depositors of the former Silicon Valley Bank, Santa Clara, California, 2023-03-13, https: //www.fdic.gov/news/press-releases/2023/pr23019.html.

(55)FDIC, Annual Report 2022, 2023-04-10, https: //www.fdic.gov/financial-reports/2022-annual-report.

(56)陈卫东、熊启跃、李颖婷:《欧洲金融一体化:经济影响、发展困境及对亚洲的启示》,《国际经济评论》2025年第6期。

(57)Hoshi T., Kashyap A., Japan’s Financial Crisis and Economic Stagnation, Journal of Economics, vol. 18, no. 1, 2004, pp. 3-26.

(58)Klingebiel D., The Use of Asset Management Companies in the Resolution of Banking Crises: Cross-Country Experience, Policy Research Working Paper, no. 2284, 2000, pp. 16-21.

(59)刘颖:《日本的个人破产免责制度及其借镜》,《经贸法律评论》2020年第5期。

(60)Haken H., Synergetics: An Introduction(3th ed.), Springer, 1983, p. 126.

(61)Stiglitz E. J., The Inefficiency of the Neoclassical Model of Competition and Markets, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 32, no. 2, 2018, p. 217.

(62)唐林垚:《数据合规科技的风险规制及法理构建》,《东方法学》2022年第1期。

(63)张钦昱:《电子商务平台治理的理念转型与制度调适》,《法学评论》2025年第6期。

(64)张颖、杨楚风、邹国昊:《中国式现代化视域下的金融工作:现实作为、经验阐释与创新路径》,《经济学家》2024年第12期。

(65)郭金良:《论我国金融监管职能配置的法律困境与制度优化》,《现代法学》2024年第4期。

(66)刘俊海:《论公司社会责任的制度创新》,《比较法研究》2021年第4期。

(67)侯东德:《金融稳定治理框架下金融科技风险的法律防控》,《法学评论》2025年第2期。

(68)Zetzsche A. D., Buckley P. R., Arner W. D., et al., The Distributed Liability of Distributed Ledgers: Legal Risks of Blockchain, University of Illinois Law Review, vol. 2018, no. 4, 2018. pp. 1383-1384.

基本信息:

中图分类号:D922.28

引用信息:

[1]何克兢.问题金融机构二级资本市场化处置的功能异化与制度矫正[J].东方论坛-青岛大学学报(社会科学版),2026,No.198(02):141-156.

投稿时间:

2025-04-08

投稿日期(年):

2025

修回时间:

2025-12-02

终审时间:

2026-01-19

终审日期(年):

2026

审稿周期(年):

1

发布时间:

2026-03-15

出版时间:

2026-03-15

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文
检 索 高级检索